I would submit that they acted in bad faith [in their own interests rather than the shareholder interest] because they told us to reject the initial MIN bid of 1:1367 because opportunistic and low ball [correct advice] and then shortly later accepted a bid of 1:1300 [a paltry increase] where none of the key considerations had changed from the initial bid
In lawyer speak = res ipsa loquitur or in plain english = the facts speak for themselves
I accept that investing in O&G is high risk / high reward so to say that the proposed drilling is high risk when CE and the CFO have basically de-risked the permit is nonsense and misleading = negligence?
AIMHO & DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Change in substantial holding from MIN
I would submit that they acted in bad faith [in their own...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)