Yeah, I know what the guidelines dictate. But just like the requirements for directors to act in the best interests of all shareholders ... it always come down to 'proof'? They have not violated any laws or guidelines if no one can prove them guilty?
Ann: Change in substantial holding from OZL, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)