CMMC however despite their debt is less risky than PAN because the cashflow from CMMC is more stable and more guaranteed, where nickel is unpredictable, but for short term holders a bid from Pan may flush out a better offer from CMMC. PAN have built a successful mine and plant from scratch with the current staff and are good explorers. Watch this space.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Change in substantial holding from ZER
CMMC however despite their debt is less risky than PAN because...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AOH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online