I agree the C&M, its a fact.. but redundency means lower production efficiencies hence high production cost. Back last decade, its all about shortage of skilled employees to any of the miner or contractors but now companies have greater focus on production efficiencies but not necessarily redundency.. appreciate it, i understand that MML doesn't have a positive cashflow but if you look around, others miners like PRU, KCN, and others dont have either... its been a tough year for the last couple of years, POG is still in the lower range...
Dont want to argue with you but I think MML has its advantage which they have no debt.. but management is having real issues to not communicate with the market and holding up info to their chest... i would like to see some changes that's for sure.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- X64
- Ann: Change in substantial holding
Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add X64 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
57.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $129.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
X64 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online