My second last sentence from 12/8/2014 should have read "These guys would not have spent this much money on a dud, even accepting the resource is inferred". My reasoning for this is margins of error are built in, not to mention the ability to extend the mine with gold anomalies being "open", Eaglehawk being proof of this.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Change in substantial holding
My second last sentence from 12/8/2014 should have read "These...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)