Why would an SFG vendor sell on market at 0.003? There has been...

Why would an SFG vendor sell on market at 0.003?
There has been ingenious financial tricks involved in engineering this transaction.
# 1st: SFG acquired 80m shares in MWS at prices between 0.007 & o.011 (mostly at 0.01) at a cost of around $800,000.....The SP was hovering around 0.007 because of SFG buying support.
# Then came the hugely discounted rights issue at 0.002!!!....Almost unheard of....From 0.007 to 0.002.....SFG acquired a further 100m shares in this exercise ( rights + shortfall)
# The last trick was the issue of a couple of billion to SFG at a "deemed" acquisition price of 0.007.
In other words SFG is sitting on a massive "nominal" CGT Loss.....The 1st 80m shares is genuine CGT loss & the rights issue is a comparatively small CGT gain.....All up, the vendors of SFG are sitting on roughly $10m CGT Loss (mostly "nominal" or engineered)
I take this sale by Giddyup as "nominal"....it means very little if we look at the full financial engineering effort.....The market didn't blink or panic after the announcement.
Not putting a gloss on the matter...Just trying to understand it.
I have opined before that trading in MWS has been & will always be difficult to read....Trading a trader....A tough task.