IMO this is more clearing the decks crossing the i's and dotting the t's which given the overdue time frame has been insisted upon by a major player for whatever reason.
Further given the relative value at tim of deal - I would guess EMI are as anxious as the other players to restore value to the coy and its Sp so they can get back their cash.
Could of course be due to the pre trial discovery - who knows.
But as i said at the beginning only a guess and IMO DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- QIN
- Ann: Change in substantial holding
Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-18
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 45 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add QIN (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online