Originally posted by MaryJane55
I don't usually post in this forum, though I've been keeping an eye on it for over a year.
Some of the things being posted on here are truly bizarre. Narratives are being presented heavily by some posters quite strongly and to me this has been quite a revealing few days as to the volume of traders who come onto HC trying to control the narrative of the stock in some way. I would caution people to be very careful with what you are reading, go back to your own investment thesis and views on the stock, remember your own timelines and not let the expectations of others overtake your own logic and assessment of the situation. Just because someone is posting their views on a forum does not mean they know more than you. The most vocal people in our virtual room are not necessarily the most intelligent/informed, but merely the most confident in their own opinion (despite the ignorance upon which ideas may be based). Basically, this is a long way of saying DYOR.
Personally I believe this Ann is where the business has shifted. We have moved from development of tech to commercialisation of a product (with tweaking left of course). Meaning the video of the build is one of the first, and to me, critically important part of this commercialization process. They are about to show what their product can do to the world. You want them to rush this? Really?
Additionally, I cannot see how people believe the company has done anything wrong here. They released the ann to the market upon achievement and verification, I believe the video could not be released at the same time, because they would have to disclose upon completion, and then go away with the footage and complete editing etc etc. I find it strange that people are encouraging the company to put at risk not doing the best possible job in a key video release. I hope the company ignores all your emails and badgering and continues to keep their eyes on the long term prize, rather than short term shareholder whims.
But as I began by saying, this, as with all other posts on here, is just my opinion of the situation. DYOR.
MJ
Great post MJ.
Cool, lets see if there is a "demonstration" at the AGM then.
BTW. What does the words demonstration and upon mean to everyone and why is it mentioned in the prospectus that the shares convert "upon" demonstration, yet the demonstration comes after conversion? Or is everyone happy that the demonstration has already occured?
I'm still learning how to read these prospectus' so maybe I've misunderstood what it all means.
(20min delay)