StockholmRod, why do you bring another share into this discussion and compare it to KZA on this thread?
What you have just said is just plain codswhallop!
For a start KZA has two platforms not just one, and both are better than anything out there, the board have put their own money into the latest SPP, they don't have a CEO who is selling any freebies that they have received for nothing either?
AVH have a product that is good, but also one that is way overpriced and also relies on another technology who seem to think that they don't need what AVH has?
I see KZA as a takeover target? I can't see anyone who would be interested in a company that is losing money and is heading for oblivion?
PNV the company whose back you try to ride on? seem to be going for the CEA method, not spray on skin?
I believe you are on the wrong horse somehow? please keep the company you are obviously in? out of this discussion!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- KZA
- Ann: Change in substantial holding
Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)