Interesting
The changes were due to performance rights issues om 3/8/2018, 2/8/2019 & 4/8/2020 - should not those changes have been notified back when they happened?
Also, if you start with the 111m shares & add on the new issues you arrive at a figure that is 333,333 different to the ending balance disclosed in the notice
Just wondering?
Sort of fits in with the continual "no news" scenario we have been fed for years - obviously that scenario extends to major shareholder/chairman notices of changes to their shareholdings - or am I missing something here?
Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
