Sorry ipv6ready, not sure I understand what you are suggesting here. This is a take over - if this goes ahead then ALB is going to buy everyone's shares for $3. ALB is not going to be soaking up anything for $3. If it doesn't go ahead then I doubt ALB can buy enough shares to influence the board + Gina. Unless I have misunderstood the entire episode. If so can someone enlighten me.
(this isn't directed at ipv6ready) And while on the subject of GINA - what is the benefit of including anyone else in her bid for a seat on the board. She has 11% or thereabouts. That's only 4% less than TG. She has all the finance she needs to do what ever she wants. Why would she need the likes of Chris E or ALB or Min Res ot anyone else for that matter, when there is a perfectly good team already getting ready to finalise mining. The team, as far as i can see, that hasn't put a foot wrong in the entire development of Kathleen Valley.
Again, I may be missing something ....
Just a giant thought bubble - please DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LTR
- Ann: Change in substantial holding
Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-95
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
74.0¢ |
Change
-0.030(3.90%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.794B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
77.0¢ | 77.0¢ | 73.5¢ | $12.03M | 16.10M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 339920 | 74.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
74.5¢ | 109036 | 6 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 339920 | 0.740 |
8 | 870031 | 0.735 |
20 | 102940 | 0.730 |
14 | 242553 | 0.725 |
20 | 180133 | 0.720 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.745 | 21500 | 2 |
0.750 | 131650 | 4 |
0.755 | 257600 | 3 |
0.760 | 149266 | 7 |
0.765 | 29342 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LTR (ASX) Chart |