Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-11

First 11 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jcurve

3,884 Posts.

1326

19/11/23

14:59

Post #: 70984315
Share

Originally posted by PVPVG: ↑

"Ironically, your post unequivocally proves that he could."
The entire point of the post was to point that out.

"He can just stop selling.
Perhaps even buy instead?"
Some may even call it manipulation but let's not open that can of worms, what it does expose is his poor ethics.
"Selling wouldn't be an issue if the demand was there"
Yeah sure we can talk supply and demand, its a ratio and you know what kills the ratio is one individual being responsible for >30% of supply
The fact is he could block trade out but has chosen to line wipe on consecutive days and it's playing into the psychological positive/negative feedback loop, I believe this is whats killing demand.

Full disclosure I don't support Rodney Cocks or Guy Headley compensation increases either, it is out of line based on company earnings.

Expand

I understand what you're saying, but it doesn't make sense to manipulate the price downwards with high volume if you intend to continue to sell high volume when you're trying to reduce your position, particularly when there's little supply coming from elsewhere.

If you want to get out of (or reduce your exposure to) an investment you've lost faith in and have no control over, when you're in that deep you're stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Ideally you'd employ an algo to find and execute the best case scenario.

Appreciate your opinion and disclosure.

Last edited by jcurve: 19/11/23
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply