Citi is just an intermediary that is used as a vehicle to facilitate the short selling. looks like an investor enters into an agreement with Citi under a securities lending by agent agreement. I suspect the client instructs citi to buy x amount which then are used to short sell. The client pays interest to citi and the profit / loss sits in the clients account (not citi). May not be 100% but just opinion after a quick read of a report by ASIC consultation paper on securities lending and substantial holding notice from July 2019 - google it
Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DYL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.50 |
Change
0.080(5.65%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.449B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.44 | $1.52 | $1.44 | $9.285M | 6.259M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 30941 | $1.48 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.50 | 61220 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 15/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DYL (ASX) Chart |