I think I predicted this reverse take-over at least 13 months ago - check me out.
SIG paid a dividend of half a cent per share. If you had 100K you made $50.
Half a cent!
The future might be bright and we have to wear shades but we need a dividend policy that ascribes something iike 50% of profits for the growth you seek and 50%n for dividend, like a BHP or a FMG.
Then we increase "demand" for the stock from those, like a Super Fund seeking regular return whilst they wait for your 'expected' growth - which might be a Bunnings experience?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.81 |
Change
0.030(1.08%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.43B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.80 | $2.84 | $2.78 | $41.95M | 14.96M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 153620 | $2.81 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.84 | 6000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.11pm 18/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SIG (ASX) Chart |