The sheer inconsistency in some posting is laughable. Apparently it is wrong to buy off market 2M shares based on the argument if they were purchased in the market it would drive the share price through the roof and thus those off brought off market have been gifted with an unfair advantage. Yet apply the same logic to the seller, if he had allowed to sell his 2M share in market by the same argument the price would have been driven to the floor. It is a nonsense argument for it makes no difference if the willing buyer and willing seller are buying 1 share of 2 million shares the effect is the same. The agreed upon price. In This case it Paul Hopper who drove the market price down to 33 cents not the buyers. This is where the deal was down. Unfair NO.......an advantage NO. The real winners of this deal is again been the small retail shareholders who were saved by in the market selling IMO designed to do one thing and one thing alone. IMHO to destroy the share price of KZA. Again thank to Hishenk and dir.
KZA Price at posting:
43.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
