What technology is capable of is not always what is commercially viable on the scale we are talking. It seems Manganese is the choice of many car manufacturers already, it is not a quick or easy decision for them to reverse now that the wheels are in motion.
I'm yet to see a compelling argument to make me think there is a better alternative.
I also disagree that E25 are not profitable, I suspect they are.
What technology is capable of is not always what is commercially...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add E25 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.0¢ |
Change
0.010(4.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $48.38M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 21.0¢ | 22.0¢ | 21.0¢ | $12.77K | 59.75K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15265 | 21.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 22.5¢ | 1722 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.02pm 14/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| E25 (ASX) Chart |