Ann: Change of Auditor, page-35

Has anyone considered the very remote possibility that EY could be currently already acting for a number of our potentially big household name customers who are now possibly intending to enter formal contracts / agreements with BRN... which IMO could be seen or raised as a " Conflict of Interest" matter for EY to continue on acting for BRN and being privy to strictly sensitive commercial BRN in-house information that they could/would have access to .......

Purely imo by way of an example: say if EY was hypothetically already acting for say someone the like's of Samsung or any other big household named Co ..... as EY who would you want to continue acting for ..... Samsung or some other big named Co ... or Brainchip !!! ... my guess would be that EY would stay engaged with Samsung or other big fish...I would also think that EY may/would /could/possibly be involved already involved with many of our potential customers through EY's international offices and contacts.

Like always DYOR