Ann: Change of Director's Interest - M McComas, page-18

I voted no and am about 10% of that number, so clearly im an outlier/muppet that thinks the directors could be doing a lot more for that number of performance options.

It's infuriating to me. Apparently shares in CXO are actually just confetti.

• SB is already paid big bucks
• They continue to miss targets/timelines
• Terrible, like beyond believably terrible communication
• Growing number of staff on the books now, and they are likely to need more capital sometime early to mid next year
• Yahua deal is now at risk
• No new offtake agreements despite apparent interest. Remeber this was supposed to be sorted with Ruifu 18 months ago, and the fines were weeks away as well from memory.
• No update on funding this mine. Plus we still owe LTR money.
• FID moved again (3rd time that I'm aware of).
• They are still drilling - why??? Conserve capital you clowns, until you start generating money. I want my shares to be worth something - did anyone at the AGM ask about this obvious waste of money?

Those of you who voted yes, please enlighten me why? Because I can't see it.

Note: Despite management clearly taking the piss with these performance options, I still believe the project itself looks like a ripper, we just need much better leadership at the helm.