"In reference to Saba’s presence on the share register, Mr Cuffe...

"

In reference to Saba’s presence on the share register, Mr Cuffe said: “They’ve given the impression that they’re not going to be an agitator – but if they were to, and the ideas were good, tell us.”

“We’re all doing this pro bono, there’s no management fees reaching our profits – we’re doing this from the good of our hearts to help medical research in Australia. If there’s a better way to do things, we’d like to know.”

If Mr Cuffe loves hearing how to do things better, perhaps can start reading the posts above in this thread, some more confident HM1 director buying BEFORE today might have helped for one.

Whilst they do it "pro bono", essentially many of those involved get great publicity for themselves and their funds for free. Not to mention those who then suggest mandate changes to invest in unlisted securities. Perhaps a "better way to do things", would be um, dunno, consult the shareholders first? Instead of keeping them in the dark and only pondering improvements when a NY hedge fund lobs up with 10%.

Those that get the lights shined on them for plugging their stocks, any chance they could also buy some HM1 stock on market, do they really believe in the product or just like the lovely media articles about them?

Many shareholders were ok with the fees going to charity. However did they sign up for this massive stock piling of franking credits when they could be utilized in their hands? What are they waiting for, the government to take away the franking credits before they dish them out?

No need to wait for Boaz ideas from New York Mr Cuffe. He probably won't give you any as wants to buy more stock first.

Plenty of ideas to start the ball rolling here, and in other threads here!