Why would they do that? So max they could have sold at would be what a 30% profit, which would be about $600k collectively between them. As you indicate they "knew" this infomation was false then they open themselves up to all sorts of legal ramifications.
When Paul Dickson for example earns $420k directly from the company, why would they expose themselves to the potential lawsuits etc that this would create.
It makes no sense. Your strategy here seems to be all over the place.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- IGE
- Ann: Change of Director's Interest Notice - Conversion of Options
Ann: Change of Director's Interest Notice - Conversion of Options, page-78
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 79 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)