Best practice from institutional shareholders viewpoint is for directors to only ever buy, as selling often sends a very negative signal as to a company's prospects. Buy-only directors are either planning to run a successful company in perpetuity with dividends in prospect, or to be taken over (not at low levels though).
NG not only has bought, but rather than a token amount, he is demonstrating he has plenty of skin in the game, and this is at least one box ticked. If the company can improve / rectify its operational performance, then expect a solid re-rating (may take 3-12 mths), perhaps back to the $2.50-$3/sh level, notwithstanding POG.
Best practice from institutional shareholders viewpoint is for...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RRL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.62 |
Change
-0.035(2.12%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.220B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.56 | $1.64 | $1.51 | $18.53M | 11.68M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6000 | $1.61 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.62 | 3208 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 19/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RRL (ASX) Chart |