@fatcitywalker
Yes its a case of recognising there could be a risk, quantifying the risk and then risk mediation procedures.
No biggie if aware of early on and some judicial care taken in a sensible precautionary way.
Most everyone here still had BOOM!! ringing in their ears and sailed on with no clue. Everything first starts out as page 16 news. FGR can add to there arsenal of "bringing first world standards to SL mining".
The whole point of HC is to wring out and tease out these issues.
At the very least, FGR needs to be fully on top because for sure as ... someone at a meeting will ask a question "Is it safe?" For our sake FGR need to be on top of it, EVEN IF none of the other graphene companies are not.
It could be a loaded question and part of the asker's risk metrics.
The sun tan TiO2 is a good example of something safe not being so safe the smaller it became.
@fatcitywalker Yes its a case of recognising there could be a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
