Ann: Change of Directors Interest Notice, page-106

Creative speculation to say the least, each to their own though.
- Suggesting a "familiar face" as in Hancock will be a shareholder of Equinox? based on him owning shares in the same company as the substantial holders of PF1 also own shares in?
- subliminally suggesting Hancock might want to obtain Equinox's I/O project?

IMO - if Hancock, or anyone else for that matter (ie: ASX:FEL, ASX:CLE) wanted PF1's I/O project they would have approached the Company when it was on the market?
Was the Hamersley I/O Project actually put on the market for sale?

Maybe prospective buyers were put off by
- Low grade by International Standards - as per the JORC at 54 / 55% Fe, will be sold at a discount
** As per the (ASX:FEL) Hancock/Proactive Investors interview, the low point cut off for premium ore is 60%
- High cover/strip ratio
- High in impurities -15% combined SiO2 and Al2O3, which may incur more pricing penalties
- Located in a challenging geographical location
- Transport reliant on neighbours being accommodating with access agreements, if the infrastructure can actually accomodate increased I/O loading and the company does not have an economic and technically feasible logistics solution

re: quote "Now in regards to the alleged serial "conmen" that the HATERS here go on about."
Not sure where you got this idea from but using HotCopper's advance searching tool,
Keyword - conmen Tags/Code: PF1 - there is only two instances of "conmen" that come up in the search results:
- 1st instance, was your post
- 2nd instance, a reply to your post

As for the content of the rest of your post - see post 54634664

cheers