fwiw I was never certain we'd beat CAP's pul result, but I felt...

fwiw I was never certain we'd beat CAP's pul result, but I felt it a likely probability, and with better safety profile I was like many here, over exposed to this ship wreck. I never envisaged an outcome under or inline with placebo, and for that reason I'm sure we've been mislead. You could argue the result we had was a possible outcome - ATL1102 doing nothing, even though it addressed CD49d and that was a biomarker from peer reviewed scientific papers, which Voit no doubt felt would result in some fruition, otherwise I doubt he'd have any interest in being involved. I believed our result would be 30% placebo effect, minus the +7 outlier which brought us to a +.11 outcome. That was my conservative estimate which I think I posted somewhere. To have our result equal to placebo / or slightly worse as it was just screams foul play to me and whilst no one's going to jail over this, they should.