What does that say about the the chair, he brings on 2 new board...

What does that say about the the chair, he brings on 2 new board members the exits them only months later.

So should the shareholder be saying the don't have faith in the chair? who is ultimately responsible for the dud appointment of Whittaker, the turbulent board shenanigans, remember he was the CEO prior to Whittaker.

Nothing screams stability and strategic foresight like changing board members like your underwear then parachuting in the biggest shareholder as the savior.

obviously the chair and Whittaker have clearly been able to dupe Datt into believing their Bs so why not bring him on as another friendly to bolster their positions.