From my reading i believed that the shipping issue was a minor one, and the main take home point is that the payments can be deferred indefinitely by paying a higher rate on shipped product.
IE if they are no longer shipping. they don't need to pay the royalty, and when they do restart shipping, the royalty will be at the higher rate to compensate LMCH for the deferment.
Or have i got all that wrong?
Ann: Claim against BRL, page-87
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
81.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(0.61%) |
Mkt cap ! $155.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 80.0¢ | 81.5¢ | 79.0¢ | $22.60K | 28.12K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12578 | 79.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 82.0¢ | 177555 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRL (ASX) Chart |