Ann: Clarification on Previous ASX Announcement, page-82

I agree but here's the thing I'm trying to figure...

These guys being the board of directors have no 'money' or skin in the game, thus why do they give a rats to make such a bold move to dislodge kelly.

One would think they would prefer Kelly's plan being a longer term of tenure/employment. They don't have shares or even option plans/incentives that I'm aware of?

There is motivation or greed somewhere. Figure that part out and the missing part of the puzzle with complete the picture