Ann: Clarifications on suspension and AFR articles, page-211

First 211 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tolate

10,578 Posts.

940

15/02/23

08:01

Post #: 66251346
Share

Originally posted by Beobachterund: ↑

Worst case scenarios are horrible for SH and your feeling for a déjà vu, im sorry for it, but what makes you to feel like this?
AVZ is not on the card to be a total loss.
The Muppets here want to tell you that, but all what will comes up and in worst case scenario, avz will hold 36%,most likely 51% of the project.
We are at the most critical point now and it seems all comes together against AVZ incl. a multi billion dollar Chinese player, but it is not only for us SH a 10 months time of mess, also the big community of haters, community of corrupt people and the community of big players where not able after 10 month, to name Manono as their project. Why it should change now, what is different?
The haters are not better if the double or triple their posts against everything connected to AVZ, not the people who think, one more night and we are a flying rocket.
We can not discuss facts, because they never changed in 10 month and nothing new and no decision made according to the facts.
March is Paris Timeline and this could be the first stone fall's and the domino start. Could be or not, who knows.

.
Best wishes
.
BEO
.
P..S.NOBODY here in this thread is a BOD member, so let them raise their words.... If it comes like this, äähhh mostly not....

Expand

Your JOKING....???????????
The Muppets here want to tell you that, but all what will comes up and in worst case scenario, avz will hold 36%,most likely 51% of the project.

Look management has constantly informed STAKEHOLDERS, that we OWN 75% now your words above paint another picture....lol
Calling concerned S H muppets is going overboard...? Now this is why they are concerned...lol by PATHETIC POSTERS stating rubbish like that.
So what you are saying NOW accept the worst scenario,and be happy.......OMG

AVZ Price at posting: 78.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply