CU6 clarity pharmaceuticals ltd

Ann: Clarity to present COBRA and CLARIFY abstracts, page-63

  1. 1,019 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1190
    Perhaps if we delve deeper into the performance of TLX591 on the study I referenced (so that we are not accused of being selective by simply presenting what's on the abstract), here are some highlights from the full report.

    The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoint is stated as: '... the rate of disease progression based on follow-up PSA levels and PSMA-PET imaging ...' I wrote this in bold because some of my TLX friends have changed their minds! They are now dismissing the value of PSA levels as a measure of disease progression, when it was ok to use it on the studies they quote as showing better or similar results to Pluvicto!

    The drug administration was as follows;
    a) Cycle 1: 1.08–2.68 GBq of Lu-TLX591 based on their baseline blood results and clinical frailty.
    b) Cycle 2 - depending on the patient’s reported side effects and laboratory toxicity after the first cycle: 1.01–2.85 GBq of Lu-TLX591
    c) Cycle 3 - In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), a single repeat dose was administered after 14 days.

    (I know someone who would have said straightaway that this dosing schedule wont work - its rushing an underdosed drug to market - Clarity don't do that)!

    COMMENTS: For comparison:
    1) Pluvicto was dosing at 7.8GBq in their trials
    2) Clarity dosing was at 4GBq to Cohort 1, 8GBq to Cohort 2, and 12GBq to Cohort 3.



    RESULTS

    SAFETY
    I wont focus on safety simply because - IF the treatment had worked, then perhaps it would have been worthwhile!
    But in short, over 50% had hematological adverse effects, and one had DLT.

    EFFECTIVENESS

    PSA as a marker of response to treatment
    • 38% had ANY PSA decline! (versus 100% in SECURE)
    • 33% had NO change
    • 38.9% got worse

    Imaging (using 68Ga-PSAMA-11)
    • 1 patient improved
    • 50% had no change
    • 41% got worse

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6768/6768913-125f2f3489761b010e140433d48ffda0.jpg

    For comparison: The still small SECURE STUDY has already had more successes than this 18 patient cohort that evaluated TLX591!

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6769/6769022-755998e86b8c4a26a061e9a8af5dc1c1.jpg
    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6769/6769029-0e25bd7b704baa707d1c146fd44e34c2.jpg
    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6769/6769036-4f57c1114cefb7504f483ae7609b5c38.jpg



    REFERENCE

    Nguyen H, Hird K, Cardaci J, Smith S, Lenzo NP. Lutetium-177 Labelled Anti-PSMA Monoclonal Antibody (Lu-TLX591) Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Treatment Toxicity and Outcomes. Mol Diagn Ther. 2024 May;28(3):291-299. doi: 10.1007/s40291-024-00699-w. Epub 2024 Mar 6. PMID: 38446353; PMCID: PMC11068829.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
$2.52
Change
0.130(5.44%)
Mkt cap ! $810.1M
Open High Low Value Volume
$2.39 $2.54 $2.37 $5.141M 2.072M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
2 6820 $2.50
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
$2.52 3500 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.17pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
CU6 (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.