The company has informed us just fine. The difference is simply...

The company has informed us just fine.

The difference is simply that the posters you have named, along with a whole lot of others on this thread, have done their due diligence on this company, and you haven't really.

Having said that, I have no clue why the SP popped 12.7% yesterday. I would be happy to rest on @HarkenBanks' assessment that it's just a rerate because the company is experiencing steady, linear, predictable growth, but the fact that the volume was through the roof makes me wonder. Maybe it's just traders hitching a ride for a few pips? Interesting times, if nothing else, and at least the movement in the SP is green

Tidbit 1: the reason people mention the word 'defamation' is not to stifle alternative opinion, it is to discourage the posting of defamatory statements.

Tidbit 2: for what it's worth I was very, very impressed with the rebrand. It's easy to look at something and simply say "I don't like that", but I  consider myself pretty critical in the area of creativity and production values, and whoever they commissioned to execute the rebrand did a very good job imho.