TRI 5.00% 1.9¢ trivarx ltd

Ann: Clinical Study Shows Improvement to Diagnostic Standard, page-28

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 6,767 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 4475
    I think you nailed it there. If MEB technology purpose is to replace all current measurements, then it won't cut it. But MEB is meant to provide a support tool to clinicians. Let me pose this question. Out there, of all that is available that we know of cost more plus at best going to help give 50% accuracy. Now here is MEB that is objective and results repeatable and more accurate at 70% and costing much less. If you are a clinician, which one would you give priority to help you with your diagnosis of a patient? I know which product I would choose. And if a patient is told of all the available tools, accuracy of each tool and cost, I believe even a mental health patient would know which they want to pay for
    Last edited by fattchoi: 06/09/18
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add TRI (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.