Couple of points that caught my eye -
1) PromarkerD name was hidden so no bias involved
2) 78% 'very' or 'extremely' likely which suggests the questions most likely had a 5 point scale. So not only were most of the respondents in favor of using a predictive test like PromarkerD, they were significantly in favor!
Extrapolate that 78% to the 31M diabetics just in the US alone and you really start the long term possibilities here.
Couple of points that caught my eye - 1) PromarkerD name was...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
35.5¢ |
Change
-0.010(2.74%) |
Mkt cap ! $58.05M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 36.5¢ | 37.0¢ | 35.5¢ | $87.84K | 244.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 63043 | 35.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0¢ | 72542 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.59pm 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PIQ (ASX) Chart |