So they are paying US$66m for a business that in the 12 months to October 2022 year reported "normalised" NPAT of US$13.7m:
![]()
Which obviously looks very cheap.
But then, in the next breath they say there will be a US$5m earnout payment if CY23 EBITDA exceeds $12m:
![]()
Which implies NPAT for CY23 which would be a darn sight lower than the $13.7m quoted for the 12m to October 2021. Which would make the acquisition a lot less cheap.
Unless the normalisation adjustments that were made in order to arrive at the US$13.7m number are large, in which case that US$13.7m figure is not very meaningful.
Or alternatively, the US$12m EBITDA target for the earnout is going to be exceeded by far.
In which case that figure is also not very meaningful.
So, a strange way to present things, making it nigh on impossible to work out what sort of valuation multiple they are actually paying for the business being acquired.
.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CLG
- Ann: Close the Loop to acquire ISP Tek Services
Ann: Close the Loop to acquire ISP Tek Services, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CLG (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
32.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $172.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
32.5¢ | 32.5¢ | 32.0¢ | $24.70K | 76.77K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 4693 | 32.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
32.5¢ | 86360 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 54916 | 0.320 |
20 | 187340 | 0.315 |
19 | 428714 | 0.310 |
8 | 199921 | 0.305 |
23 | 223347 | 0.300 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.325 | 86360 | 3 |
0.330 | 161638 | 6 |
0.335 | 42538 | 5 |
0.340 | 170272 | 8 |
0.350 | 35682 | 4 |
Last trade - 11.17am 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CLG (ASX) Chart |