Off the top of my head I believe GEv was using the assumption that they woud have to deliver 200 MMSCF per day to meet contractual obligations. This is why based on distance from port they may need 6 ships to meet these stipulations rather than 4. Comes down to the tyranny of distance and the diminishing returns associated with it......
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: CNG Pipe-to-Pipe Transportion Project Economics
Off the top of my head I believe GEv was using the assumption...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 83 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PV1 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.3¢ |
Change
0.001(4.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.51M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.2¢ | 2.3¢ | 2.2¢ | $8.08K | 361.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 458182 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.3¢ | 22409 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 458182 | 0.022 |
4 | 133746 | 0.021 |
4 | 556750 | 0.020 |
1 | 125000 | 0.019 |
6 | 618157 | 0.018 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.023 | 22409 | 1 |
0.024 | 134833 | 2 |
0.025 | 139240 | 4 |
0.026 | 60000 | 1 |
0.028 | 75300 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PV1 (ASX) Chart |