You're arguing over a small reporting error. Filling the thread with nonsense arguments insulting people, when you know a few thousand meters, means nothing to this project overall, and comparing metres drilled to PMT means nothing overall. What means something is the amount of measured and indicated resources, which is significant. What matters is the discussion of funding options.What matters is the management with connections in South America and the current prices Sigma is getting for their green lithium, combined with FOB production costs being 2nd in the industry.
This is like arguing over spilt milk that is cleaned up easily.
Remember that time I predicted the shape of the initial WR1 deposit based on afew holes, to the point my depiction that took me seconds to do was used and spoken of by management, then proven some time later?? I used nothing but inate pattern recognition skills to do this. No mining software was required. You can call me nostradamus if you like, but that won't make a difference to anything here.
You're wasting your time spreading seeds of doubt on this one. This deposit is way to convincing at this point and has a direct company to compare with in Sigma and just look at how well Sigma has gone into production, nothing short of spectacular getting above market prices with very low costs. $462 per tonne FOB production costs, 2nd lowest in the industry. What do you think WR1 will be FOB wise in the middle of nowhere with frozen ground and extreme conditions with beautiful lakes nearby.
Would you like me to go post in WR1 threads spreading many seeds of doubt with significant merit attached?? I'll pass.
Every project has pros and cons..Its about weighing them up correctly and seeing through the things you are focusing on here that make zero difference to the narrative.
Based on Sigmas' current resourse size and FOB production costs..LRS is undervalued, in my opinion. 50% of Sigmas current price would be closer to par at around 1.2-1.3 billion AUD, this is due to the pathway to success being known and probable thanks to Sigma lithium. 70% of Sigma once in production based off current resource stats comparatively. I think Sigma will go up from here, so these numbers should grow, and I believe Sigmas' recent performance is why LRS has held up through the storm better than most as of late.
Next.
Just my opinion. Dyor, please.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LRS
- Ann: Colina Lithium Deposit - Mineral Resource Estimate Upgrade
Ann: Colina Lithium Deposit - Mineral Resource Estimate Upgrade, page-74
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LRS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
12.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(3.85%) |
Mkt cap ! $349.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
13.0¢ | 13.0¢ | 12.3¢ | $785.0K | 6.264M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 94165 | 12.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
13.0¢ | 779201 | 11 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 94165 | 0.125 |
37 | 3392182 | 0.120 |
17 | 946743 | 0.115 |
18 | 2438546 | 0.110 |
5 | 1128753 | 0.105 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.130 | 729201 | 10 |
0.135 | 889815 | 16 |
0.140 | 1461377 | 18 |
0.145 | 487100 | 12 |
0.150 | 671191 | 14 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 12/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LRS (ASX) Chart |