The thing is your point is moot. You're talking about 100s of intricate variables while using back-of-the-napkin math and comparing to, honestly, i don't even know what WR1? or nothing as you're shutting comparison down. How do you say the exploration costs were expensive when they've produced the results in the time they have and as you mentioned moved to 'tier 1'. What is it costly in comparison to? we're waiting to hear your answer. You've already made the mistake of confusing the expectation for 100mt at Colinas alone and not understanding the combined resources of Salinas in its entirety.
At this point, it really is just seeds of doubt and based on your history, perhaps it's envy? But it's not constructive it's just nothing to be honest. If you want to debate, put together a comparison spreadsheet, break down the costs, and use the data compared to these 'rightfully priced' exploration costs by said companies. Let's analyze and break these down and assess their performance. For the minute, you're just coming across like a goose like Veecat. who bought in the 20's, panicked and sold, left the thread around 18c if memory serves me right. Just have a little self-awareness, you seem more confused than anything.
Ann: Colina Lithium Deposit - Mineral Resource Estimate Upgrade, page-77
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?