You are inferring the leadership team purposefully 'starved'...

You are inferring the leadership team purposefully 'starved' that technology of $ to prevent the founding scientist from getting performance shares!!! And put at risk their reputation and legal consequences!! And to do that you are saying they purposely decided not to fund the test to a point where they would have a highly accurate clinically validated test for lung cancer on the market by middle of this year?? you are either dreaming, clinging to your previous view or have a tendency for conspiracy theories. No offence...