Ann: Commences Federal Court Action against ASX, page-636

Anie,
Im talking about the OM report and the timimg of it nearly 18 months after the fact , when ADI license is due. Your inferences about revenue manipulation have been repeatedly dispelled which you chose to ignore in preference of repetitious innuendo (fake news)
June 2018 ISX had 12 customers , naturally 6 big ones contribute the majority of revenue..
All these companies whilst ISX worked for were
ASIC endorsed and licensed.
Of course integration revenue is one off . How many times do you think a company is required to be integrated (once).
The bank statements for ISX during the period in question were provided to ASX.
We don’t know what’s in there as they weren’t for public viewing.
All revenue is accounted for , you just claim it’s suspicious.
My question is why is this a big deal 18 months later . It was accepted then and it is ancient history.
Why is OM and media digging dirt on ISX now.
Is it the banking license and new trading products soon to be released.
That see us in direct competition with ASX.

The real issues are happening now not 18months ago. Who asked andpaid for the
OM Report to be written and why?, Where there major shorts of the stock and did they have something to do with the report.
Who stands to benefit from ISX demise.
Follow the money.