The downfall of that company was in its actions by going off...

The downfall of that company was in its actions by going off label and other unscrupulous promotional activities. That is not the case here.

The case against Acadia is a shorter supposedly making a case for the overpriced Acadia share price and basing a lot of its assertions on Daybue being less than successful with follow thru repeats.

I am sure Acadia will be looking hard at the numbers and the reasons (if there are any) and making appropriate strategic decisions. After all it has paid good upfront money for the worldwide rights!

As someone has previously pointed out Neuren is collateral damage. This would only be of monetary success to Culper if they had a short position in NEU. Is there any evidence of that Culper has such a position? None of which has been disclosed by them in their report. Maybe the authorities or NEU could request such disclosure from Culper?