WOWZA ... we're in the AFR all. I just went scouring through the Government's proposal for facial recognition tech, and check what was published today ....
Facial recognition database pushes us towards Orwellian future
http://www.copyright link/content/dam/images/g/y/u/a/w/j/image.related.afrArticleLead.620x350.gyu8qu.png/1507097808904.jpg
The system will work by allowing CCTV cameras everywhere to recognise our faces. Shutterstock.com
http://www.copyright link/content/dam/images/1/4/1/9/d/r/image.imgtype.afrAuthorAvatar.120x120.png/1426050004956.png
by
Paul Smith
News that state governments
plan to acquiesce to a federal government move to provide the facial biometrics of citizens from driving licences for use in a national security database should set off all kinds of alarms in the minds of law-abiding Australians.
The system will work by allowing CCTV cameras everywhere to recognise our faces because of the details taken from our licences. These photographs are used to create a faceprint which, like a fingerprint, can distinguish us based on the unique features that we possess.
Anyone who has had a passport photo taken in the facial recognition era will know that it is still not always an exact science – lighting has to be correct and people have to remove their glasses, but this is so the software can create a perfect map of our faces. The system records things like the distance between your eyes, bone structure, how thick your lips are, what shape your nose is, how big your eyes are and – depending on how detailed they are going – can include retina scans.
Apple is confident enough in the technology that
it will use facial recognition technology in place of a fingerprint scan for users to unlock the new iPhone X. However
it remains to be seen how great or fallible that is.
http://www.copyright link/content/dam/images/g/y/t/w/e/y/image.imgtype.afrArticleInline.620x0.png/1507075863713.jpg
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says facial recognition technology from driving licences will be used to keep us safe. Andrew Meares
Software and technology related to the processing and analysis of images is speeding ahead rapidly;
ASX-listed Brainchip for example has developed what it describes as Spiking Neuron Adaptive Processor (SNAP) technology, which it says learns autonomously in the same way as a human brain.
It is being used in software which allows casinos to spot dealer errors on baccarat tables in casinos through their security cameras and is beginning to pick up significant work in the fields of civil surveillance.
At least two European airports, including Bordeaux in France, are using it with their cameras to help identify intrusions, and it is being used by some European police departments to watch people coming through subway stations in order to match faces with lists of wanted suspects.
There can be no doubt that from the perspective of trying to combat terrorist attacks, the ability to identify anyone on a watch list in real-time is potentially valuable, but the amount of privacy and protection against governments that citizens are being forcibly made to give up is horrifying.
Currently the federal government has access to faceprints of everyone that has recently got a new passport: this change would hoover up the vast majority of the rest of us, and remove any notion of a right to expect privacy in our day-to-day lives (and yes, we have no Bill of Rights.)
We are being asked to trust that centralising this identifying data with the federal government of the day is fine, but what about any future government that may take power?
It isn't too much of a sci-fi nightmare leap to see how this could lay the groundwork for a country where you are unable to go anywhere without a record of what you are doing.
We are being asked to trust future governments, who we do not yet know, and who could very feasibly be more authoritarian than the current regime, not to use these new powers to keep everyone under surveillance, restrict their movement and stop public gatherings of anyone they don't like.
The argument that you only need to worry if you are doing something wrong does not fit with the notion most of us have about a free society where you can do things on the quiet if you want.
There are plenty of things that many people do which are legal and unthreatening but which could cause a great degree of embarrassment or personal turmoil if they were exposed publicly. As well as protecting us, we are about to give the current and future governments free reign to collate footage to blackmail or smear anyone they like.
We will be promised safeguards, and be told to trust that nobody outside law enforcement will access this personal data, but that is a big ask even with the current government, let alone politicians and rulers in the future who we have not yet heard of.
It is hardly out of the realms of possibility that corruption or cyber attackers could lead to these systems being breached or misused, then imagine if you are in witness protection or in a safe house hiding from an abusive partner.
You will know that walking past just one of millions of CCTV cameras could blow your cover. What a horrible way to live ... we need to properly debate the impacts of such changes before they become law, not after.
(20min delay)