"...
but enough time already wasted on this flea of a company."
Hi Chris
If one thinks about it - it's lucrative work if you can get it - raise millions in dollars from other people (and don't participate in the cap raise yourself), grant hefty salaries all around and other benefits (AGMPL and Volcan spring to mind) - stay in suspension for over 12 months - fail to submit financial updates and then everyone gets bored and moves on.
Meanwhile ... shareholders should ask - what's happening to the CGB bank balance? Specifically, the funds provided by shareholders.
Oh ... and there is little sentence posted by another poster in response to a post made by you.
"
I have the right to reply whether tagged or through inference, as I do have the right to comment about the negative posts."
And just to assist with the application of words - the writer implies and the reader infers. So, it is difficult to reply to an inference.
Back to the substance. My question is this - how (in this universe) would you classify or identify a "negative poster" on a CGB thread?
What is there to be positive about? If a poster confines themselves to commenting on the facts, how is it possible to be anything but a "negative poster"?
In light of all of the available evidence, I would re-frame the term "negative poster" and view them as a "factual poster".
