Ann: Company Update - Key Developments, page-128

Please keep on topic. If you're unable/unwilling to answer anybody else's questions directed at you, then you cannot expect the same in return. Agree?

"and btw when do I need your permission to post here?"

Nobody likes a hypocrite. Read your old posts, you've been the forum police for years telling people who can and can't post or create a new thread. I'm simply pointing out that you want to have a discussion - so have a discussion, and address the plethora of questions directed to you that you've dismissed.

But because I'm a nice guy I will address yours because some just don't 'get it'. If the Government requires clarification of the hydrogeological queries related to the EIA, and the company are the ones who have submitted said documents that is missing information/put together in a way that doesn't make sense in other words, then it's 100% on the Company. Or are you accusing the government and officials of not being able to comprehend these types of reports?

Also yes the company has been abysmal in almost all aspects of "fast tracking" this project. I say this with regards to the absurdly optimistic timelines they tack onto all their milestones which they have missed 100% of the time. And people wonder why the share price is where it is... Is it all the companies fault? No. But to say they have no part would be coming from pure agenda pushers.

Don't forget, Gcar, AGY have been attempting to "expedite official approval receipt" for a very, very long time. Do you know what the definition of expedite is? Maybe they should stop using terminology that they cannot live up to, don't you think?

One last thing that maybe the Messiah can explain to us mortals. The new terminology they've come up with for this month is "Off-take currently quarantined for strategic process". Not one person here, for as knowledgeable as everyone is, can explain what this means.