The main focus still remains Woods Point going on the number of pages dedicated to it compared to other projects. They are still spinning the same tale about MS that's been going for 50 years. Quoting production figures up to 1963 whilst ignoring more recent failures.
How do they get away with this crap? You should not be allowed to only cherry pick favourable production figures and not quote the ENTIRE production history because it doesn't suit your agenda. It's called lying through omission and I wish someone would make this mob PRINT THE TRUTH!
WRM Price at posting:
6.4¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
