I totally agree they haven't committed to the cobalt and there is risk here, but there was risk with the lithium play as well and we know the results.
We knew there was lithium in the waters, but did't know the concentration or if we has the volumes required for a commercial operation.
We know from current sampling that the concentrates of cobalt are enough for a commercial operation as long as the cobalt resource is big enough for the project to proceed.
on balance, the lithium was higher risk than the cobalt is, and I am invested accordingly and everyone should make there own assessments before investing.
But this is spec mining.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RMX
- Ann: Company Update
Ann: Company Update, page-209
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 65 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
Add RMX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.423M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | $750 | 750K |
Featured News
RMX (ASX) Chart |