What are you on about? We literally just posted about how the polymetallic intercepts (i.e. GD003) were less than 40cm (probably a single vein). This is not broad. Please add more substance to your posts rather than hyped up rhetoric. If you want broad, look at Boda.
Also: "It seems at this stage that the only difference between NML and SVY is that WE DO seem to have found a very serious potential porphyry target that does appear to be very clearly defined by the 3DIP survey!" This is a lode of crock. SVY actually have hits that resemble a weak porphyry system (although at this stage lacks thickness). All NML have at the moment is a charge-high at a likely uneconomic depth and 1-2 holes that on their own provide the weakest sniffs of a porphyry system.
Sorry, but nonsense like that needs to be called out.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NML
- Ann: Compelling IP chargeability target defined at Morning Bill
Ann: Compelling IP chargeability target defined at Morning Bill, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NML (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $28.55M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
NML (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
AHK
ARK MINES LIMITED
Ben Emery, Executive Director
Ben Emery
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online