"Please note: nobody diamond drills with the aim of hitting 6m...

"Please note: nobody diamond drills with the aim of hitting 6m Li - this was a very bad (and expensive miss x 2) no matter your language."

Here we are 2 years later and you still manage to outdo yourself with moronic statements like that. If the company knew what was there, they wouldn't be drilling exploration holes in the first place - they are literally drilling there because they don't know what is there and if there is any Li mineralization or not, and if there is something there, the drill sampling will determine the grade and thickness after it has been drilled, sampled and samples sent to the lab for assay.

How do you propose that exploration companies find orebodies? Is there some sort of X-Ray vision that I don't know about to determine the grade and thickness of orebodies without drilling?

You've had it pointed out to you by numerous posters that these 2 holes were the first reported in TA2 so far, and are not dissimilar to some of the early drill intercept results of 6-7m at 1 to 1.5% Li that we saw in the early stages of exploration drilling at TA1. Stop embarrassing yourself - you've been here flip-flopping around for almost 2 years here and still haven't bothered to learn or absorb any of the technical details of exploration drilling and its processes and justification, and the forum has been replete with different posters giving their various opinions about the drill priority, drill results and their implications as to the potential size of any resource.