I think the original poster was implying that if the underwriters did not have confidence in this deal they could have bid the SP up above the offer of 2.70 and incentivising retail to take up their entitlement instead of buying for cheaper on market as many have.
Allowing the underwriters to take up the retail shortfall and have a proportionally greater stake.
No where was it said the underwriters had a 'choice'.
No need to knee-jerk and assume ignorance, it may not be the most elegant way to word it but the central point trying to be made is a valid one.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RRL
- Ann: Completion of Retail Entitlement Offer
Ann: Completion of Retail Entitlement Offer, page-10
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
MTL
Mantle Minerals' Nick Poll talks to HotCopper on finding gold grades up to 3.57g/t at Mt Berghaus
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
Add RRL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$1.68 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.265B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.70 | $1.71 | $1.67 | $6.370M | 3.759M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 4209 | $1.68 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.69 | 43263 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 4209 | 1.675 |
6 | 16176 | 1.670 |
11 | 102166 | 1.665 |
8 | 46026 | 1.660 |
5 | 78234 | 1.655 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.685 | 43263 | 3 |
1.690 | 99760 | 7 |
1.695 | 21850 | 2 |
1.700 | 35777 | 4 |
1.705 | 38047 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 01/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RRL (ASX) Chart |