Technically, yes; practically, no.
- the recipient of the claw back payments (FIG's funder) would be foolish to agree to delay payments given FIG is cash flow negative, and FIG has little of value to pawn.
- the trailing commission is likely worth only a fraction of book value in any sale;
- nobody's going to loan them money - they don't have a business of any sort to collateralize a loan, and it's clear they have no near term prospect of turning the business around in any form.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FIG
- Ann: Completion of strategic review and business update
Ann: Completion of strategic review and business update, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares