Ann: Conflict of Interest Policy, page-73

The reasons for keeping the current board seem to be weak. "We can't get rid of the current management at this point in time, we're too far down that road". source: https://youtu.be/_Fc0KiwcSiI?si=KtRS8hUEWDe_qWA8&t=480

Have no fear, I think 99.99% of the people on this forum believe MMGA will not get voted in (primarily because the theory that they might be aligned to the Chinese has taken off like wild fire). I also don't believe MMGA will be voted in. However... that does not mean that the current board deserve to be there.

Here is a shareholder who probably demands more respect than 90% of the other shareholders. And his explanation is also weak in my opinion.
https://youtu.be/_Fc0KiwcSiI?si=KtRS8hUEWDe_qWA8&t=480

Eventually, I will pull together a list of all the things the current management have done, and we can have a good long hard look at it. Then maybe at the AGM next year there can be candidates which are not hit with the "must be chinese aligned" conspiracy bat which might be voted in.

Also, the AGM next year might actually be more important if that is the one where we can not re-elect Nigel Ferguson & Rhett Brans (who are not currently up for re-election at this AGM). So MMGA need to start planning for that one instead in my opinion.