Yes, the cost of mining was always going to be MASSIVE due to that machine breaking layer, probably the reason the area was overlooked by other companies as being unprofitable.
They will have spent around $100m+ of shareholder funds to get to a stage where they now need to make it economically viable with only inferred resources.
If there is so much potential then where are all the records of all the CLZ directors showing the shareholders their confidence by purchasing shares in their own company?
They don't even have any confidence in their own company!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Consolidation/Split - CLZ
Yes, the cost of mining was always going to be MASSIVE due to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CLZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.544M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CLZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable